Electronic health records are all the rage. As a nurse, they make documenting easier,
faster, safer and more reliable....but do they really? According to the Report of the AMIA EHR-2020
Task Force on the status and future direction of EHRs (2015) many clinicians
are voicing concerns that EHR use has had unintended clinical consequences,
including reduced time for patient-clinician interaction, new
and burdensome data entry tasks being transferred to front-line clinicians,
and lengthened clinician workdays. Additionally,
interoperability between different EHR systems has languished despite large
efforts towards that goal. These challenges are contributing
to physicians’ decreased satisfaction with their work lives.
How do we fix
these inconsistencies? How do we make a system that is supposed to make our
lives easier better? There is a plan to make the EHR better for those that use
it most, the health care worker. Monegain (2015) breaks down several steps
developed by an IT task force that will take the EHR into the next century.
This is a breakdown of the ways in which the EHR can be streamlined and
improved.
First,
the process of documentation needs to be streamlined and simplified. In many
cases it seems that members of every discipline enter the same information over
and over again. There is repetition that takes each person valuable time. This
ends up being time that could be better spent with the patient. Most of the
documentation comes down to the physician being the main responsible party but
other members of the care team should share in the documentation and should be
just as valued as the physician. Even the patient could input some of the data
themselves, especially regarding their own history.
Documentation is not just about
writing notes like it used to be in the past. The EHR required us to input
encoded data that often causes issues based on the fact that there is no
standardization. Unfortunately the EHR
does not have a standardized interface, so this often causes glitches in the
system and problems as codes are not recognized. There really needs to be
standardization of this process.
The EHR is looked upon as being
such a miracle system that there are not a whole lot of resources set aside for
research and improvement. According to Monegain (2015) we need similar studies
to understand the cost and benefits of proposed data items to be recorded in
the EHR. We need researchers looking at the EHR long term and continually
finding areas where improvements can be made.
The restriction of informatics
research is being caused by commercial monopoly. The EHR has been hijacked by
commercial companies that are edging out the smaller competition. This is
making the EHR suffer because the research is not being done in order to look
at safer, more efficient and perhaps more cost efficient options. Big business
is truly stifling the innovation in this area. We need to prevent this type of
monopoly from happening so we can continue to expand and improve.
The EHR is an amazing system but it is not without its problems. The very thing we found to make out job easier is creating other problems that need solving. It is only with continual research and innovation that we can solve some of the problems the EHR has created. This way we can get back to what matters most, the patient.
References
Monegain, B.
(2015). What will EHR’s look like in 2020?. HealthcareITNews,
Retrieved from http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/what-will-ehrs-look-
2020
Retrieved from http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/what-will-ehrs-look-
2020
Payne, T.,
Corley, S., Cullen, T., Ghandi, T., Harrington, L., Kuperman, G.,
Zaroukian, M. (2015).Report of the AMIA EHR-2020 task force on the status
and future direction of EHRs. Journal of the American Medical Informatics
Association. 22(5), 1102-1110.
Zaroukian, M. (2015).Report of the AMIA EHR-2020 task force on the status
and future direction of EHRs. Journal of the American Medical Informatics
Association. 22(5), 1102-1110.
No comments:
Post a Comment